OL 620 Module Four Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric Write a short paper addressing job analysis and job evaluation as they relate to employee compensation. Begin by thoroughly reading Chapter 6, including the case study “Internal Consistency at Customers First” at the end of the chapter. Then write a short paper that adequately answers the following questions:
Do you think that job analysis and job evaluation will benefit Customers First? Why or why not?
What is your opinion of Joan’s view on job analysis and job evaluation?
What do you recommend that the compensation professionals at Customers First do? Why? Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document (in addition to a cover page and references) with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use at least three sources, which should be cited according to APA style.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Job Analysis and Job Evaluation
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides thorough rationale with relevant and specific examples
Indicates opinion as to whether job analysis and job evaluation will benefit Customers First and provides relevant and/or specific details in explanation
Indicates opinion, but the explanation is irrelevant or lacks specific details
Does not indicate opinion as to whether job analysis and job evaluation will benefit Customers First
30
Joan’s View on Job Analysis and Job
Evaluation
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides thorough rationale with relevant and specific examples
Indicates opinion of Joan’s view and provides relevant and/or specific details in explanation
Indicates opinion, but the explanation is irrelevant or lacks specific details
Does not indicate opinion of Joan’s view
30
Recommendations Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes thorough recommendations with relevant and specific details in explanation
Makes recommendations for the compensation professionals at Customers First and provides relevant and/or specific details in explanation
Makes recommendations, but the explanation is irrelevant or lacks specific details
Does not make recommendations for the compensation professionals at Customers First
30
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%