2

Discussions

Student Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course

Professor

Date

Part 1

I agree that religion and science remain inextricably linked in the empirical philosophy of religion, which can be directly attributed to seventeenth-century naturalistic narratives of religious doctrine. Naturalist philosophers sought a scientific perspective on human values and attitudes, including spirituality, feelings, and conscience (Shamsaei et al., 2021). It is, therefore, evident that every human understanding of God and religion is built huge and grows in our lives concerning every recorded research and invention made in the field of science. In addition, the knowledge of the physical world, biography, psychology, or theology is all intertwined mostly in link connecting science and spirituality, although the ancient civilizations cultures had no notions of "science" and "religion" that resembled current conceptions, some forms of present thoughts on the issue repeat across collective memory.

Science and religion coexisted in the evolutionary theory. That partnership might have occurred in the theistic evolutionary paradigm, in which God and natural processes collaborated to create life (Shamsaei et al., 2021). Moreover, Theistic progression does not need to be confused with ideology or creationism. Both argue that biological evolution could perhaps clarify the development of man or the Ground. Theistic advancement acknowledges the scholarly evolutionary theory as a mechanism through which God equally made existence in this hypothesis.

I agree that theology, technology, and logic may coexist peacefully or that God is the ultimate ruler over all three. The explanations for their failure have entirely to deal with personal vanity, rather just this. Many people manipulate theology to acquire power; this will not render religion evil. Other scientists believe they already have the solutions and grow arrogant about that. Notwithstanding such, science remains unaffected. Since science has never been comprehensive, a real scientist will never appear to get all the answers. A fresh face to be discovered will disprove years of successful studies.

Part 2

The Fifth Diagnostic and Manual Of mental Disorders is the first major modification of a book ever since DSM-IV around 1994. The DSM was updated in response to breakthroughs in neurobiology, medical and community medical services and discovered flaws in DSM-classification IV's methodology and standards (Cooper et al., 2018). Most of the judgment calls had also been influenced by a contextual perspective match with the International Classification, which is set to release its 11th version elsewhere shortly.

Cooper, R. (2018). Diagnosing the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Routledge.