Essay Prompt #2
Readings:
“City of Broken Dreams” by Sara Goldrick-Rab; “Class in America” by Gregory
Mantsios; “What We Really Miss About the 1950s” by Stephanie Coontz; “The Color of
Family Ties: Race, Class, Gender, and Extended Family Involvement” by Naomi Gerstel
and Natalia Sarkisian; “Serving in Florida” by Barbara Ehrenreich; “From A Tangle of
Pathology to a Race-Fair America” by Alan Aja, Daniel Bustillo, William Darity Jr., and
Darrick Hamilton.
Context:
In “Class in America,” Gregory Mantsios argues that “most importantly, the point that is
missed is that inequality is persistent and structural—and it manifests itself in a multitude
of cultural and social ways” (par. 1).
For your second essay, please respond to the following prompt: Analyze one aspect of
American inequality and argue why it matters.
Directions:
Please write a 4-5 page essay that has a clear, specific thesis supported by strong
argumentation. When appropriate, vivid, detailed examples should be used to support
your ideas. Your essay must use three of our texts and contain a total of six quotes.
Of the six quotes used, at least two must be statistics from our texts. Please use 12-
point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, and one-inch margins. Make sure all
quotes are properly introduced with a signal phrase and cited in MLA style. When
appropriate, please also use transitions to move your reader through your argument, both
within a paragraph and from each paragraph (C5-d). Please also remember that there
should be no outside sources, and that you must dedicate at least one paragraph near the
end of your paper to discuss concrete solutions.
Your essay must contain a counterargument paragraph that includes a thorough
rebuttal. Please see A4-f, A4-g, and my prior counterargument handout for more
help.
Tips:
You might try using an outline to help organize your ideas (see C1-d). Remember, try to develop
one main idea per paragraph that is clearly articulated in a strong, clear topic sentence (C5-a).
You might also begin by revisiting our texts and ensuring you clearly understand the positions
taken by the writers. Then, you might try to isolate a particular inequality—racial, wealth,
income, gender, educational—that was covered in the readings, and analyze each of the writers’
positions. Which authors do you agree with most? Why do you agree with them? And finally,
what evidence are they citing that you find particularly compelling?
Dates:
First Draft Peer Review: Check Canvas.
Final Draft: Check Canvas.